The concept of a torsion field is one of the most debated ideas at the boundary between theoretical physics and speculative science. It is often presented as an extension of classical notions of space, proposing that reality may include additional geometric properties beyond curvature and electromagnetic fields. While torsion appears as a well-defined concept in some advanced geometric theories of gravity, the idea of an independent, physically detectable “torsion field” influencing matter remains controversial. Supporters describe it as a subtle field connected to rotation, spin, and information transfer, while mainstream physics remains highly skeptical. To understand what a torsion field is claimed to be, it is essential to clearly separate mathematical torsion in accepted physics from torsion fields as proposed in alternative theories. This distinction is crucial for an accurate and responsible discussion of the topic.
Torsion in Geometry and Classical Physics
In established physics, torsion originates from differential geometry and appears in extensions of general relativity, such as Einstein–Cartan theory. In this formalism, torsion describes a geometric property of space-time related to the intrinsic spin of matter, rather than its mass. Unlike curvature, which bends space-time, torsion represents a form of twisting at a microscopic level. Importantly, in mainstream theories, torsion does not propagate as an independent field and is expected to be extremely weak under ordinary conditions. Its effects are predicted to be significant only at very high densities, such as inside neutron stars or during the early universe. According to theoretical physicist Dr. Leonid Markin:
“In standard physics, torsion is a mathematical correction to space-time geometry,
not a new force acting freely in nature.”
This interpretation forms the baseline from which more speculative ideas diverge.
Torsion Fields in Alternative Theories
In alternative and non-mainstream theories, torsion is often promoted from a geometric feature to an independent physical field capable of interacting with matter, energy, and even consciousness. Some models propose that torsion fields are generated by rotating objects, spinning particles, or asymmetric motion. These fields are sometimes claimed to transmit information faster than electromagnetic signals or to exist independently of energy transfer. However, such claims lack experimental confirmation and are not supported by reproducible measurements. Despite this, torsion fields are frequently discussed in connection with unconventional propulsion, energy devices, and information theories, making them popular in speculative research communities.
Connection to Spin, Rotation, and Vacuum Concepts
Many torsion field theories emphasize a connection between spin, rotation, and the structure of the vacuum. In these models, the vacuum is not empty but acts as an active medium capable of deformation and torsional excitation. Spin is viewed not merely as a quantum property, but as a fundamental driver of physical interaction with this medium. This perspective overlaps with broader speculative ideas about structured vacuum, absolute space, and hidden dimensions. While mathematically intriguing, these concepts move far beyond experimentally tested physics and often rely on assumptions that cannot currently be verified.
Scientific Criticism and Lack of Experimental Evidence
From a scientific standpoint, the main criticism of torsion field theories lies in their lack of falsifiable predictions and reliable experimental support. Experiments claiming to detect torsion fields have not been independently replicated under controlled conditions. Additionally, many proposed effects attributed to torsion can be explained by known electromagnetic, thermal, or mechanical interactions. Physicist Dr. Elena Sokolova summarizes the mainstream position:
“Without reproducible evidence and clear experimental methodology,
torsion fields remain a hypothetical construct rather than a physical reality.”
As a result, torsion fields are not included in standard physics textbooks or accepted models.
Why the Idea Persists
Despite scientific skepticism, the idea of torsion fields continues to attract attention because it promises a deeper, more unified description of reality. It appeals to those seeking explanations beyond existing theories, especially in areas where physics still faces unanswered questions, such as the nature of space-time, dark energy, or information at the fundamental level. Philosophically, torsion fields echo historical concepts like the ether, reimagined through modern mathematical language. Studying these ideas can be valuable—not as confirmed science, but as a way to explore the limits of current knowledge and the importance of scientific rigor.
P.S. Unfortunately, modern science has a number of unresolved problems, and in particular, due to the generally accepted theories that form the basis of modern science. For those who want to take science out of its current confines and into a new direction, I recommend that you study the theory of the physical vacuum in more detail, as well as the available information about torsion fields, and remember the discarded theory of the aether, which was the primary theory before Einstein’s theory of relativity.
Interesting Facts
- Torsion as a geometric concept is mathematically well-defined, even if its physical effects are minimal.
- Einstein–Cartan theory predicts torsion only at extreme densities, not everyday conditions.
- Claims of torsion field devices often lack peer-reviewed validation.
- No standard instrument currently exists to measure torsion fields directly.
- The term “torsion field” is used very differently in mainstream and alternative literature.
Glossary
- Torsion — a geometric property describing twisting in space-time related to spin.
- Spin — an intrinsic form of angular momentum in quantum particles.
- Einstein–Cartan Theory — an extension of general relativity that includes torsion.
- Physical Vacuum — a theoretical concept describing space as an active medium.
- Speculative Physics — theoretical ideas not yet supported by experimental evidence.
